Keyword MANIFESTO

I’m an expert at a few things. I can deal cards, play guitar, and rock a machine gun pretty well. I’m not an expert at law, constitutional or otherwise, but who is? Fortunately for all of us, there is one simple constitutional principle which is easily understood without having the benefit of a law degree. This principle lies in the oath of office that citizens take when they are elected or appointed to a position of public trust. Local police and lower court judges, soldiers and military leaders, as well as anyone involved in the creation and prosecution of our laws, such as our state legislatures, congress, and senate, all swear an oath of office in accordance with the position they hold.

Considering recent occurences and disclosures, one particularly pertinent clause in these oaths which our leadership take is one that states that as a function of office, it is their sworn duty to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

Our constitution begins with the words, “We the People,” which is appropriate because under our representative form of government, it is ultimately the people of the country who are responsible to the constitution for it’s defense. It is the people who are responsible for cleaning house when those who hold positions in government overstep their bounds and act beyond their authority as prescribed by the constitution. The caveat is, that even though the people are responsible for their leadership who take oaths to defend the constitution, the people do not.

I would like to encourage anyone not familiar with the oaths of office that our elected leaders, police, and military members take prior to serving the public, to read, recognize and understand the importance of the oath, and the implications regarding what happens when our leadership fails to uphold it. Also understand that ultimately, the citizens of this country are as much as responsible for the failure of our leaders as our leaders themselves.

Considering human nature, it is impossible to completely eliminate all corruption from social, political and economic systems which humans create. But there IS an unacceptable level. In light of recent revelations as well as events long past, it is no longer a question whether there are some in our leadership structure who are acting illegally and in contravention of the constitution.

Case in point, the release of information by Edward Snowden – information that the government had no intention of being public. I no longer indulge in debate over the merits of what Mr. Snowden did. Whether he is an American hero or a traitor is yet to be decided, and not by me. Snowden the man is no longer an issue. The cat and the bag from whence it came are the real issue.

The recent IRS scandal, and the obfuscation of facts by accused parties surrounding the affair stands as testament to the fact that our government is not completely honest with it’s citizenry. Many documented instances of malfeasance on the part of government leaders and parties exist through the last six decades. The Gulf of Tonkin, Watergate, The Iran-Contra Affair, and more recently Fast and Furious. And these are just at the top of the pile of public domain. Any fourteen year old who is so inclined can peruse the internet and find numerous cases of our government creating false narratives for events, obfuscating facts, and generally acting in ways not in accordance with the will of the people. This is putting it nicely.

Eisenhower warned a long time ago the folly of allowing the military industrial complex to gain too much power. Kennedy warned us of nefarious secret societies who were gaining influence in social and political structures. These warnings all came over fifty years ago, and we are seeing now the results of our inaction. Many would still say that these are concepts in the realm of conspiracy theory, but I say that Presidents do not have the luxury of being conspiracy theorists. Military Industrial Complex is a phrase that Eisenhower himself coined, and would have Kennedy really addressed the entire nation on television about ‘secret societies’ if he didn’t have substantial evidence of the fact?

Many great Americans have taken the oath, but many more great Americans have not. I have taken the oath twice, and while I no longer serve, I never untook the oath. I still believe in the fundamentals of our constitution, and I also believe that there are those in positions of power who seek to circumvent or even completely disregard the law to meet their own collective ends. These criminals need to be held to account.

There are many people in positions of public trust who are true to their oaths and are doing what they can to protect the constitution. There are activist police, activist judges, and activist legislators, as well as an army of private attorneys willing to challenge the merits of our leaders. But these people are too few in number, and require the will of the people to accomplish the task set before them. Only by the will of the people will change occur. Change begins by sending a message to those who have things other than the good of the people in mind, and holding them accountable for their actions. Simply voting out the offenders, and replacing them only sends the message that these types of criminal activity can be gotten away with. We must first eject the corrupt leadership, and then focus on the corrupt system as a whole.

The thin line between a regular citizen and our public servants is drawn by the oath. Local police forces are the last bastion of defense for the people against tyrrany, because they are the lowest citizens on the judicial totem pole who swear the oath to uphold the constitution. There are ‘bad’ cops in all police forces, but there are always more good cops, as there are always more good people. But when a cop goes bad, and commits crimes or rights violations, it is on the good cops to arrest the perpetrator and it is on the courts to prosecute the law in accordance with their oath.

I for one contest that the government of the United States is illegitimate under the law. Too many instances of government fraud, waste, abuse, criminality, and corruption have been established and documented as fact to be denied. If those who do not take action to uphold their oaths and bring the corrupt, criminal elements in our government to justice, then they are complicit in those crimes, and should be held accountable as such. I feel justified in my contention, despite my lack of knowledge and understanding of law, on the basis that there has been too much corruption for too long now. It no longer requires an understanding of law to see what persists. All that is now necessary for one to see the reality of the situation is for one to look.

Americans should recognize their responsibility and civic duty in doing what they can to preserve the liberties they enjoy as citizens. There are more than 170 million people in this country between the ages of 18 and 65. With those numbers, our job should be quick and easy. At most, anyone should only have to miss a week of work to do what needs to be done. The question is, how many of those Americans really understand what is at stake, and of those, who are willing to sacrifice their time and energy to the cause of cleaning out the Hill?

To the average citizen, these things are no longer important. We only have a cursory understanding of our representative form of government, and that is because we are taught nothing about civic responsibility, and how to secure and maintain the liberties and freedoms granted us by the constitution. Nor do we have any concept of what life was like under tyrranical, oppressive rule prior to our country’s inception.

Averyage citizens, in general, have more pressing matters to deal with than the maintenance of a government by the people and for the people. They have the myriad forms of entertainment, sports, celebrities, fashion, computer games, movies, television, and the internet. And if we’re not too busy entertaining ourselves, we’re commuting longer in heavier traffic to work more hours at jobs which largely produce nothing in order to put food on the table, and then dealing with the fatigue that results. It is the freedom, the creature comforts, the diversions and distractions which we all enjoy daily that, ironically, will lead us to fail to uphold that which allows for said freedom.

I personally adhere to a strict policy of non-violence. I also abhor capital punishment because I believe it goes against natural law. I understand that the punishment for some crimes of treason is death. People are enflamed enough and empassioned enough to call for the heads of those who have commited treason. Luckily, those so enraged are very few in number, but the number grows as our feet are held closer to the flame.

I believe that there is still time to take steps to correct the malfunctions of our governments, both local and federal, but it will not be rectified by vote. This problem will only be solved by inflicting the consequence of law on those who break the law, and in so doing, sending a message that such behavior will not be tolerated by the people.

The more time passes, nearer comes the day when litigation, prosecution, and protests will lose all effectiveness, and we will be faced with a choice as individuals – to fight to secure our freedom, just like our founding fathers, or live on our knees under an oppressive regime. I say that we hold the members of our leadership – our police forces, our judges, and our military – responsible and individually accountable for the faithful execution of their oaths of office. We make THEM make the choice on whose side they will stand – with the failed, corrupted system, or with the people!

And should they choose to go against the will of the people, then all of the might and will of the people in all their numbers should be brought to bear on them.

Things That Did Not Happen

1. The Department of Homeland Security and other privately held government contractors, such as the Federal Reserve and the Postal Security Service, have not purchased over 2 billion rounds of ammunition, to include hollow point rounds. They also have not purchased over 2000 Mine Resistant Armored Personnel (MRAPS) for domestic use, or tens of thousands of M4 Carbine semi-automatic rifles.

2. There are no specifically built “FEMA camps” designed to house domestic or foreign refugees in the event of disaster or financial collapse.

3. The government does not, and has not staged “FALSE FLAG” events in order to create “PROBLEM/REACTION/SOLUTION” style incidents which justify the necessary curbing of rights of private citizens in the interest of “SECURITY.”

4. The government has not coordinated the recent influx of underage illegal immigrants at many points on our border with Mexico in order to push an “IMMIGRATION REFORM AGENDA.”

5. The Federal government and state legislatures are not fabricating artificial points of contention among its citizenry by passing legislation to protect the civil and legal rights of homosexuals and transgendered citizens.

6. There is NOT an international child sex prostitution ring. Children are not being exploited for any reason, and are not being abused in any way, are not being used for purposes of BRIBERY or BLACKMAIL. The children are just fine.

7. The United States government does not, and has never in the past, SOLD OR GIVEN weapons and ammunition to any party or group affiliated with the enemies of the State, or any rebel faction who opposes any enemy of the United States.

8. The United States government does not, and has never in the past,  TRAFFICKED OR SOLD DRUGS within or without American borders or controlled waters.

9. The United States government has never OBFUSCATED OR FABRICATED INFORMATION used to justify the involvement of our armed forces in any military engagement, past or present.

10. There are no individual or collective human beings on the planet who have designs and plans of “WORLD DOMINATION.” There are no plans to implement a “NEW WORLD ORDER.” There are no plans for “GLOBAL POPULATION CONTROL,” in any form, by any group or individual.

11. There is no plan inherent in the current economic paradigm of capitalism to intentionally inflate the value of money to the point of uselessness. The central banking system made up of the Federal Reserve, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank DOES NOT have a globalist social agenda, and has no intention to cause worldwide economic downturn by controlling the money that we use to execute our day to day life.

12. The leadership of the United States does not believe that in order to establish security for it’s citizens, it is necessary to limit freedoms and liberties. There is NO ATTACK on the rights of citizens as guaranteed by the Bill of Rights, or the Constitution as a whole.

13. There is no movement by the Democratic Senate to repeal the 1st Amendment of the Constitution, and replace it with a much longer, and much less “FREE” version of it. That was an internet hoax played on the people of this country by Ted Cruz and it’s comedic leadership.

14. Economic markets are established by the will of the consumer, and fulfilled by manufacturers. The prices of goods and commodities are set by supply and demand ONLY and are not manipulated in any way by governments, banks, or multi-national corporations.

15. The government of the United States, particularly its legislature, ARE NOT influenced by groups of people or corporations to create laws and regulations that are in the interest of their profit.

16. The leadership of the United States government, or it’s states, ARE NOT corruptible by foreign, monetary, or political interests, and DO NOT receive compensation in the form of cash, gifts, or high positions in private industry.

17. The US State Department and the Central Intelligence Agency have never engaged in the inciting of uprisings of a foreign populous, nor have they ever installed a proxy leader who is amenable to the American interests of “POLITICAL INFLUENCE.”

18. “OIL” has never been, and never will be, a singular cause for war. It has never been a primary cause for war. The production of energy for uses of locomotion and electricity by the consumption of oil are not important enough reasons to kill or be killed. The governments of the world understand this.

19. All of the things that seem to be happening, in the way they seem to be happening, are not happening. Rest assured that the interest of the common man are paramount to those elite who control the systems and machinations of this world. What you are witnessing is the struggle for our good leaders to cope with an increasingly complex and dangerous world. What is done by our leaders is in the best interest of the ENTIRE human race, regardless of social standing and station, economic worth, ability to produce, political affiliation, sexual and gender identity, race, creed, color, or religious belief.

UK Court’s Balls Shrivel and Hide in Face of BBC 9/11 Cover-Up Evidence

Tony Rooke, a British documentary film maker, refused to pay his licensing fees to the British Broadcasting Service, based on evidence suggesting a cover-up by the BBC regarding the WTC#7 collapse on September 11, 2001.

Victory was achieved in the form of the UK court completely dismissing the case, only charging Rooke the minimum 200 British pound court fee, and letting him slide on years worth of licensing fees, without question.

In effect, the UK court cried uncle, afraid of the small part of evidence related to the BBC’s alleged complicity in the cover-up, not to mention other evidence presented to the Judge in private.

One point of evidence laid out before the judge was this:

(On the afternoon of 9/11/01, the BBC reported that WTC 7 had “collapsed” 20 minutes before it actually came down. The BBC has since refused to reveal the source of that news report. Since we know, due to point 2 above, that WTC Building 7 could only have come down through controlled demolition, it is possible (if not likely) that whoever provided the BBC with that news report had inside information that WTC Building 7 was going to be intentionally demolished. Therefore, the BBC must divulge exactly the source of that news report.)

This secondary piece of evidence, in conjunction with the physical evidence regarding the collapse itself, which has been thoroughly measured and tested against what is known about building construction and demolition lends a whole lot of fodder for many more questions regarding all of the events that occurred on 9/11.

Ask questions. Demand answers.

9/11 – Questions

The following is an eye-openingly oversimplified list of glaring questions regarding inconsistencies and contradictions within the official narrative of the attacks on 9/11/01.

Did the US Government have any intelligence regarding the an attack on US soil prior to 9/11, despite the vehement denial of such intelligence by the Bush administration and US Intelligence leadership?

In 2000, British Intelligence passed on intelligence to the US regarding 3 alleged Al-Queda agents “…organizing a major terrorist attack against the US via an airline or airlines.”

In July 2001, the Afghani foreign minister was given information pertaining to a “huge attack” by Osama Bin Laden on US soil. The message was sent via emmisary to the US Consul General, and was received, but was likely ignored on the basis of ‘warning fatigue.’

Egyptian President Hasni Mubarek has maintained that Egyptian intelligence had warned US officials that Al-Queda was set to attack an American target on US soil.

British Intelligence passed information to the Americans in 1999 stating that Al-Queda had plans to use “commercial aircraft” in “unconventional ways,” “possibly as flying bombs.”

In July 2001, British agencies informed the US that Al-Queda was in the “final stages” of preparation for attacks on Western targets. Also, the British warned in early August 2001 of the possibility of a plan involving multiple airline hijackings.

German intelligence warned US, Britain, and Israel in June 2001 of plans by Middle Eastern terrorists intended to use commercial aircraft as weapons to strike “American and Israeli symbols which stand out.”

Russian President Vladimir Putin publicly stated that in 2001, a few weeks before 9/11, he ordered his intelligence agencies to report to the US that suicide pilots were training to attack US targets. The head of Russian intelligence also stated, “We had clearly warned them…”

US officials stated after 9/11 that no one ever imagined that someone would use airliners as weapons. Has anyone in US government ever imagined this?

Operation Northwoods, a military operation developed in 1962 by the Department of Defense and the Joint Chiefs of Staff proposed false flag attacks involving airliners on US soil, in an attempt to justify military action against Cuba. President Kennedy rejected this plan.

On the morning of 9/11, the National Reconnaissance Office conducted joint training exercise which included a scenario involving a small passenger jet crashing into their own headquarters in Virginia due to mechanical failure.

Was airline stock sold short days before the 9/11 attacks?

On 9/6/11, the request for put options (betting that a stock will drop below a prescribed dollar amount) on United Airlines was 25 times higher than average. On 9/10/11, the ratio of put options to call options on American Airlines was 6 to 1. Over the week of trading prior to 9/11 the average of put options on these two airlines exceeded 250 times their average.

In addition, put options on companies in the insurance and banking industry surged prior to 9/11. Morgan Stanley and Merrill Lynch, which occupied several floors in the WTC complex saw put options at rates of 308 times and 48 times higher than average in the days of trading prior to 9/11.

The Securities and Exchange Commission and the Secret Service launched an investigation into the increase in volume of the purchase of 5-year US Treasury notes before 9/11. One of the suspicious purchases was worth $5 billion alone.

A quote regarding 5-year notes from the Wall Street Journal: “Five-year Treasury notes are among the best investments in the event of a world crisis, especially one that hits the US. The notes are prized for their safety and their backing by the US government, and usually rally when investors flee riskier investments, such as stocks.” 

Were the hijackers really bad at flying planes, or were they the best pilots in the world?

Statements from the flight instructors who had the 9/11 hijackers designated as pilots as their students maintain that they were some of the worst ones they’ve had.

Would individuals who seemed unenthused about learning how to accomplish their mission, or for that matter, even learn how to fly a small plane correctly ever be selected for the job?

Professional, veteran pilots claim that some of the maneuvers executed by the hijackers on 9/11 would be exceedingly difficult for themselves, if not impossible for anyone.

None of the ‘intelligence’ on any of the individuals said to have flown the planes suggests that they were ever part of any country’s air force, yet they handle enormous, fully laden commercial jetliners like Flankers.

Skyscrapers have burned for hours and hours in the past, and even been hit by airplanes before. Why did the towers fall down?

The report by the National Institute for Standards and Technology says that the reason why towers 1 and 2 fell is based on what is called, “The Pancake Theory.” It basically states that all of the floors above the impact level caused the buildings to ‘pancake’ all the way down to the ground when the steel failed at the site of impact.

The obvious observable problems with this theory will be addressed in greater detail in another post, but brings me to the next question…

If grade A structural steel doesn’t begin to melt until it reaches 2500 degrees, and kerosene (jet fuel) burns at 1400 degrees, and burned off completely in under a minute after impact, what melted the steel?

The theory as to why some of the finest steel ever manufactured melted to the extent that entire skyscrapers were completely destroyed as a result has to do with the sustained heat generated by the fires remaining after impact. The problem with the theory is that of all the available fuel for burning (paper, office furniture), only burns at up to 600 degrees. There are numerous instances of large, steel-framed buildings, most constructed with inferior materials surviving infernos which lasted hours.

If it was understood by our government that we were under attack why was there absolutely no reaction from our military?

For almost an hour and a half, the senior leadership of the US government knew beyond doubt that we were being attacked from the air, yet at no point during the entire incident were fighters scrambled. Washington DC, highly regarded as the most secure and highly defended airspace in the world was easily infiltrated almost an hour after it was clear that there were still hijacked planes seeking their targets.

The North American Aerospace Defense Command, or NORAD, hasn’t had much to say for themselves about their role in detecting and thwarting the attacks, despite that it is one of their primary missions. The US Air Force also doesn’t know much about where they were and what they were doing on 9/11.

Where is the plane that hit the Pentagon?

Of all the photos available of the Pentagon crime scene on 9/11, there isn’t one that clearly depicts any part of an airplane. The hole in the side of the Pentagon, when compared with other holes in buildings made by large aircraft share little similarity.

The official theory as to the smallness of the hole is that the wings of the plane were sheared off by metal street light poles as the plane approached its target, however, there have been no wings photographed, seen, or recovered from the area in and around the Pentagon.

And by the way, where is the debris from the crashed plane in Shanksville, Pennsylvania?

No one knows. There just isn’t any. No luggage, no remains, no engines, wings, no fuselage. Nothing.

The explanation from the government for this is that the plane impacted with such great velocity due to its nosedive speed (nearly 600mph!) that all soft material simply disintegrated, and the majority of the airplane literally injected itself directly into the ground.

Contrast this with the Columbia disaster, in which the spacecraft exploded upon reentry into the Earth’s atmosphere, doing a little over 17,000 miles per hour, the leading edge of it’s wings heated to a blistering 3000 degrees Fahrenheit.

Even after an airburst explosion, the Columbia was recovered, piece by piece, from multiple debris fields spanning three states.

Among the items recovered were parts of the shuttle, clothing and personal items, human remains, as well as a petri dish full of worms used in a biological experiment during the Columbia’s last voyage – AND THEY WERE ALIVE! Decide for yourself.

Security is pretty tight in Washington DC. Shouldn’t there be more video surveillance records of the plane that hit the Pentagon?

Washington DC is regarded by some who know stuff as the most heavily defended airspace on the planet. Yet the defensive reaction was non-existent. The Pentagon has the most technologically advanced security systems that a building could have, including surveillance of its facilities, yet scarce video evidence exists. From what the public is allowed to see, they can’t even determine for themselves if a plane even hit the Pentagon.

Officials say one did, but the Pentagon and Shanksville have the same overarching problem – no evidence of planes.

There were no warehouses or hangars with inventory of plane parts and personal effects, no debris field photos prior to removal, nothing one would normally expect as part of an airplane crash investigation, not to mention crime scene. There is only one government-verified video of the Pentagon that day, captured from a parking lot security gate, yet security cameras can clearly be seen on and around the pentagon and grounds in the photos from that day.